There are probably more than just two reasons to be optimistic about a young 24 year old flame throwing starting pitcher but I had to very big reasons come to me and I felt compelled to share. I was watching an old "Prime 9" episode on MLB Network the other day at some insane hour in the middle of the night and it was showcasing something to do with starting pitching, I don't remember the list, and throughout the episode the crew mentioned Sandy Koufax and Roy Halladay. Okay before Dodgers, Phillies, Blue Jays and MLB fans in general begin to remove their bookmark for the site and unfollow us on Twitter hear me out. I'm not comparing the two I am merely showing you that it's not unheard of for a fire baller to find his control late and harness it en route to a great MLB career.
Eovaldi has a career 15-35 record with 4.07 ERA in 79 starts. While Eovaldi led the league in hits allowed in 2014 his stuff, the "stuff" you cannot teach, is there and undeniable and possibly just a Larry Rothschild tweak or two away from making him a legit #1 starting pitcher for years to come. Why am I so optimistic you ask and how does Koufax and Halladay fit in? Glad you asked, read on.
Look at Koufax's first six seasons in the majors on a pretty good Brooklyn/Los Angeles Dodgers teams:
Year | Age | W | L | G | CG | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | SO | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1955 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 3.02 | 12 | 2 | 41.2 | 33 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 28 | 30 | 136 | 3.64 | 1.464 | 0.4 | 6.0 | 6.5 |
1956 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 4.91 | 16 | 0 | 58.2 | 66 | 37 | 32 | 10 | 29 | 30 | 82 | 5.05 | 1.619 | 1.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
1957 | 21 | 5 | 4 | 3.88 | 34 | 2 | 104.1 | 83 | 49 | 45 | 14 | 51 | 122 | 106 | 3.39 | 1.284 | 1.2 | 4.4 | 10.5 |
1958 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 4.48 | 40 | 5 | 158.2 | 132 | 89 | 79 | 19 | 105 | 131 | 93 | 4.38 | 1.494 | 1.1 | 6.0 | 7.4 |
1959 | 23 | 8 | 6 | 4.05 | 35 | 6 | 153.1 | 136 | 74 | 69 | 23 | 92 | 173 | 105 | 4.04 | 1.487 | 1.4 | 5.4 | 10.2 |
1960 | 24 | 8 | 13 | 3.91 | 37 | 7 | 175.0 | 133 | 83 | 76 | 20 | 100 | 197 | 101 | 3.49 | 1.331 | 1.0 | 5.1 | 10.1 |
Year | Age | W | L | G | CG | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1998 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 1.93 | 2 | 1 | 14.0 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 245 | 3.57 | 0.786 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 8.4 |
1999 | 22 | 8 | 7 | 3.92 | 36 | 1 | 149.1 | 156 | 76 | 65 | 19 | 79 | 125 | 5.36 | 1.574 | 1.1 | 4.8 | 4.9 |
2000 | 23 | 4 | 7 | 10.64 | 19 | 0 | 67.2 | 107 | 87 | 80 | 14 | 42 | 48 | 6.47 | 2.202 | 1.9 | 5.6 | 5.9 |
2001 | 24 | 5 | 3 | 3.16 | 17 | 1 | 105.1 | 97 | 41 | 37 | 3 | 25 | 145 | 2.34 | 1.158 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 8.2 |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Sorry for the Capatcha... Blame the Russians :)