Excuse me while I start the day off with a little bit of a
rant. Sometimes, well generally, I just shrug off comments and articles that I
consider to be “Bush League” or flat out idiotic because I know the game and I
know the industry. People put stuff out there for the shock factor, to get
people talking and more importantly to get people to read their stuff. I understand
it and I can respect it to a certain extent but I don’t necessarily have to
agree with it. Then there are times, like an article released yesterday labeled
“Yankees in a bind without Capuano,” that really just grinds my gears. The
Yankees aren’t in a bind whatsoever, they just got handed a chance to right a
wrong and actually develop the young talent that they keep saying they are
going to develop.
Without Capuano, who was barely mediocre in 2014 for New
York, the Yankees can actually let a young guy develop and showcase his
talents. The team may go through the growing pains like they did with Shane
Greene in 2014 but they would likely come out better across 30-35 starts with
Mitchell or even Adam Warren in the rotation. Anyone can see it, but that
doesn’t garner views.
I don’t get it because when you read the title you think the
Yankees are in a bind but when you read the article it is well written and lays
out all the Yankees alternatives including Esmil Rogers. The article was well
written but the title is deceiving. Why? You’re a great blogger I respect the
hell out of you but you and I both know that you’re better than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Sorry for the Capatcha... Blame the Russians :)